COP FAQs

COP is shorthand for ‘Conference of the Parties’. The term COP refers to the supreme decision-making body of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), as well as to the global talks on climate change matters. At these talks, governments negotiate the actions and rules for addressing climate change. There are also platforms outside the negotiations available to others to share information, build capacity and discuss policy solutions around climate change. 

 

COP takes place typically every year over two weeks. This year's COP was set to be the 26th climate meeting, which is why it is called COP26. Due to COVID-19 concerns, COP26 is now delayed until 1-21 November 2021.

 

The location and presidency of COP tends to change for each meeting, rotating among five UN-recognised regions – Africa, Asia-Pacific, Latin America and the Caribbean, Eastern Europe, and Western Europe and Others. The UK Government will host COP26 in Glasgow and has appointed Alok Sharma as President. The role of the ‘COP Presidency’ is to be a neutral overseer of the agenda and tone for COP, and to deliver outcomes.

The UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change - also called ‘the Convention’) was created in 1992 at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, and entered into force in March 1994. The Convention sets a framework for efforts by governments to tackle climate change, with the ultimate objective to stabilise greenhouse gases “at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic (human-induced) interference with the climate system”. Almost all countries in the world have ratified, or agreed to be ‘Parties’ to, the Convention.

 

The UNFCCC is also the name of the Secretariat charged with supporting the global response to climate change. Among other things, the Secretariat makes practical arrangements and prepares official documents for climate talks, provides expertise, assists Parties in implementing their climate commitments, and coordinates with other relevant international bodies. The UNFCCC Secretariat is based in Bonn, Germany and is headed by an Executive Secretary, Patricia Espinosa.

The official UNFCCC COP is split into a Blue Zone, for official badge-holders only, and a Green Zone, which is open to the public to visit. In theory these two spaces are linked but in practice there is very little flow of people from the Blue Zone into the Green Zone. We expect the Green Zone to be within the Glasgow Science Centre Building where the public and school groups will be able to interact with various organisations, from businesses and universities, to NGOs and international organisations. 

 

Within the Blue Zone at the Glasgow SEC there are UN officials, representatives from governments, negotiators, advisors, a lot of press and media, and organisations with 'Observer' status. In the second week heads of state will arrive and at COP26 we expect 196 to be present. The observer organisations are grouped into ‘constituencies’ including indigenous groups, women and gender, local government, business and industry, young people, trade unions, environmental NGOs and research NGOs. 

 

In addition to the official COP spaces there will be a Civil Society Hub that will act as a base for activists from around the world to meet and socialise. This will be open to everyone - those badged delegates of COP from global civil society and activists, both local and those who have travelled to Glasgow to add their voices to calls for global action.

1. Take part in Climate Fringe Week
2. Volunteer
3. Host an activist coming to Glasgow
4. Add to Glasgow's Green Map for COP26
5. Attend an event
6. Register your local town hall/faith space as an event space 
7. Show live-streamed events in your community 
8. Join a working group

COPs are exciting, inspiring, infuriating and often baffling. Blocking countries work together to stop progress, progressive countries try to move things forward, civil society keeps the pressure up on the key issues. There are powerful speeches from Prime Ministers whose countries are disappearing beneath the rising seas and empty words from countries who just want to keep on the fossil gravy train.

 

The biggest failure was in 2009 in Copenhagen when expectations were very high that there would be a new binding, global deal done to tackle climate change. World leaders turned up in the second week of the conference to find that nothing useful had been agreed in the first week. At one point Barack Obama and other world leaders were huddled in a room sitting around Russia’s President Medvedev as he typed out the weak Copenhagen Accord on his laptop.

 

Probably the biggest success was in 2015 when the Paris Agreement was negotiated, committing countries to keep the global temperature rise well below 2°C and make efforts towards keeping it below 1.5°C. Despite many weaknesses the Paris Agreement has been a surprisingly effective spur to both governments and business.

COPs are large political events with thousands of stakeholders from across the world. The atmosphere can often seem festive, but the instance of a COP is infused with purpose. The people who participate in the negotiations and the groups that organise outside of them are determined to see outcomes that will reduce the human-made threat to the climate and biodiversity, and fundamentally shift the relationship between humans and the environment.

COPs can therefore be excellent leveraging events. The attention and subsequent scrutiny of the world’s population are focused on the host country, who can lead by example. Devolved governments like those of the UK’s four countries can use this attention to press for strong UK leadership on climate goals. They can also bring together regional and subnational actors and identify a strong role for these leaders in tackling the climate crisis.

That’s a lot of pressure on one meeting of the UNFCCC, which is why it’s important to situate the COP within a larger, coordinated and sustained approach to ending the climate and nature crisis. We know that we need action at all levels of society: from community, local, state and global actors. And we know that in some places, at some levels, the actions taken and the policies made insufficiently address the scale and urgency of the problem.

 

Finally, as the recent pandemic has shown us, intergovernmental organisations are only part of the response to a crisis. While the UNFCCC can negotiate for commitments on the climate, we must hold them accountable by holding our governments, communities and ourselves accountable as well. The science for how to end runaway global warming and devastating biodiversity loss is clear, but actually ending it depends on us working together, each playing a part in our better future.

Governments need to set out bold and ambitious emission reduction commitments known as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) in advance of COP26, which must be aligned with the 1.5°C temperature goal and the principle of equity. NDCs are a pledge of how far countries will reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. Equity can broadly be interpreted as the ‘polluter pays’ principle. The richest countries of the world were the first to industrialise, have the greatest capacity to tackle the climate crisis, and are currently responsible for the vast majority of global emissions. However, most climate impacts are being felt now in the poorest countries who have done little or nothing to cause this crisis. The increased likelihood and intensity of droughts, floods and heatwaves, alongside issues such as rising sea-levels and ecosystem degradation, are all disproportionately experienced by the most economically impoverished parts of the world, and the poorest people within them.

 

COP26 must deliver on this key principle of equity. This means that if submitted NDCs are inadequate, COP26 must agree to more robust requirements for richer countries to rapidly increase their ambition in line with their historical responsibility. All decisions made at COP26 must also be aligned with the common goal of maximising the total reduction in emissions as soon as possible, and accounting mechanisms must be aligned with the best science. Crucially, COP26 must underline that climate action does not stop at our borders. To achieve 1.5°C, it is essential that richer countries rapidly increase their financial support to developing countries to help them grow post-carbon economies, and to help the poorest adapt. COP26 must also address the issue of ‘loss and damage’ and establish a robust financial mechanism to compensate countries who are paying the costs of this crisis that they did not cause.

 

At previous COPs, it has been easy for richer countries to actively ignore climate injustice, to brush it under the carpet, in favour of ensuring ‘business as usual’ continues in their own countries. This has led to a disconnect between what the most vulnerable countries need from the COP, what civil society is calling for, and what actually comes out of the negotiations. For COP26 to be successful, it must bridge this gap by ensuring more effective participation of civil society and people on the frontline of climate change.

The Paris Agreement was drawn up at the United Nations Climate talks in Paris in

December 2015. The talks were a great success, or a bit of a failure, depending on who you speak to.

 

They can be seen as an important step on the way to getting action on climate change but it was a limited step and left serious omissions, doubts and concerns.

 

The good news: a massive group, nearly all of the world’s nations (around 197 of them), committed to a detailed agreement to drive action on climate change. In particular they agreed to hold ‘the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre- industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C. The recognition of the significance of 1.5°C was, with the benefit of hindsight, probably the most significant outcome especially as it came with the acknowledgement that to restrict warming to 1.5°C would ‘significantly reduce the risks and impacts of climate change’.


The bad news: the drive to reduce emissions depended on nationally determined contributions (NDCs); the NDCs offered were voluntary, far too low and left the planet heading towards 3°C of warming. The action offered wasn’t offered quickly enough and a proper review was pushed off to 5-yearly intervals. Crucially the Paris Agreement did not do nearly enough for those who had done the least to cause the problem. The question of who pays for the damage already caused, and that will be caused, in the future remains an unresolved ongoing point of contention.

Civil Society is represented officially at COPs via several ‘constituencies’ which represent their member organisations in official proceedings. These include Environment and Development groups, Young people, Trade Unions, Women and Gender Groups, and Indigenous groups. 

 

Outside the official COP global civil society contributes in many ways, from putting pressure on decision makers at COP through stunts and advocacy, to building momentum in-between COPs, and providing a welcoming space to host people from around the world as they travel to the city where COP is taking place. In the UK civil society has been working hard since Glasgow was announced as the venue of COP26 to ensure people of all backgrounds can be part of the COP experience. This has included working with civil society groups in Chile and Spain to ensure the passing on of vital COP knowledge and mobilising, and the creation of a UK COP26 Civil Society Coalition to coordinate the work in the lead up to COP. 

 

This work covers areas including logistics, mobilisations (particularly the huge march expected to happen the middle weekend of COP), political strategy, Glasgow local engagement, and global solidarity. Civil society is also working with the UK and Scottish governments to create an inclusive COP and has regular information sharing meetings. Civil society and governments also work together to facilitate access to the 'green space' at COP26, which is the official UN area that civil society has traditionally occupied. 

 

In addition, civil society is working to create the People’s Summit, an annual meeting that runs parallel to COP and brings together organisations and networks from various parts of the world to creatively share experiences, promote alternative solutions and strengthen global organisation and local action to curb the climate crisis. COP has huge potential for Scottish and UK civil society to both welcome and learn from global civil society as campaigners travel from around the world to share stories of climate impacts and to call for climate justice – there are many ways to make the most of these opportunities.

Children and youth form their own United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change civil society constituency known as YOUNGO that has a formal voice in COP proceedings. YOUNGO is made up of organisations and individuals who identify as youth and any young person can join and participate. YOUNGO has a pre-COP event in the three days preceding COP known as Conference of Youth (COY). This is a preparatory space for COP, and a place where young people from around the world can exchange knowledge, skills and experience.

At present there is not an official constituency within COP to represent people with disabilities and this is recognised by many as an omission. People with disabilities attend COPs as representatives from campaign organisations and take part via the other constituencies, however this is recognised by many as an omission and there is a campaign to make Disability NGOs one of the official constituencies of the COP.

There is an text only version of this document available here.

X
X